AAFA backs legislation to overcome the ‘pink tax’ price discrepancy
11-4-2024
AAFA BACKS LEGISLATION TO OVERCOME THE ‘PINK TAX’ PRICE DISCREPANCY
The US apparel and footwear sector has said it is
behind new legislation being weighed to investigate price discrepancies between
everyday products for women and men.
The
American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA) backs the proposal of the Pink
Tariffs Study Act, being introduced by Congresswomen Lizzie Fletcher and
Brittany Pettersen from the New Democratic Coalition (NDC) Trade Task Force,
voicing concerns over the alleged “century-long potential gender-bias and
regressivity” within the US tariff system.
The congresswomen said they introduced the Pink Tariffs
Study Act to examine the “prevalence and impact of pink tariffs,”
which they argue may lead to women paying higher prices for everyday items
compared to men.
These tariffs allegedly affect a wide range
of products, including everything from razors to clothes.
The Pink Tariffs Study Act would require the
US Department of the Treasury to conduct and deliver a report to Congress
“examining potential gender bias and regressivity” within the US tariff system.
American Apparel and Footwear Association
(AAFA)’s president and CEO, Steve Lamar believes there is “no room for gender
bias” in trade or tariff policy, yet he noted this legacy has been allowed to
persist for nearly a century.
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles.
However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so
we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
Lamar said: “Thanks to Reps Fletcher and
Pettersen, and to the Progressive Policy Institute, for advancing the dialogue
on this issue. We look forward to working on a bipartisan basis with Congress
and the Administration to make sure our tariff policy sheds its regressive and
misogynistic features.”
The congresswomen allege that traditionally,
gender bias in the consumer space has been referred to as the “pink tax,” which
occurs when companies charge a higher price for women’s products than similar
to men’s products.
However, they pointed out, there is evidence
that import taxes, also known as tariffs, may directly contribute to women
paying more at the register than men.
In the bill, Fletcher and Pettersen state:
“While often hidden from public view, tariffs have a significant impact on the
prices Americans pay in stores every day. Research has shown that tariffs
disproportionately impact products women commonly use.
“But despite making up $100 billion of the US tax system, tariffs are rarely examined as a form of taxation, and rates on mass-market items haven’t changed in decades. Every American deserves a fairer tax system, and this legislation will help us get to the bottom of the issue.”
Ed Gresser, vice president and director of trade and global markets at
the Progressive Policy Institute, is of the view that it is past time for US
policymakers to systematically examine the tariff system, which he claimed
currently appears to tax “women more than men and low-income families more than
high-income families.”
Gresser continued: “I applaud
Representatives Fletcher, Pettersen, and the New Democratic Coalition’s Trade
Task Force for their leadership on this essential issue. Tariffs are not only
trade policy but one of the seven main tax systems, and as in the other six, US
policymakers must be vigilant to identify and correct gender bias and
regressivity in it.”
The
congresswomen further added this legislation has been endorsed by the NDC
Trade Task Force and the Democratic Women’s Caucus.
By Just Style
Copyright © 2021 Powered By AEC Egypt